The learning curve of introduced robotic‐assisted hysterectomy versus skilled laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study aimed to compare introduced robotic‐assisted hysterectomy (RAH) and skilled total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for the treatment of benign gynecological diseases.MethodsPatients who underwent RAH or TLH by two surgeons at the Tottori University Hospital between January 2018 and May 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were patients with 100–300 g of uterine weight. The exclusion criteria were patients with stage IV endometriosis. Mean operative time and learning curve were compared among the first‐half RAH, second‐half RAH, and TLH groups.ResultsThere were 40 eligible cases (first‐half RAH: 20 cases, second‐half RAH: 20 cases) in the RAH group and 44 cases in the TLH group. The total operative time (TOT) of the second half of RAH was significantly shorter than that of the first half of RAH (p = 0.021) and was comparable to that of the TLH group. The operative time (OT) of the second half of RAH was shorter than that of TLH (p = 0.023). The preparation time of TLH was shorter than that of the RAH group (p < 0.01). The learning curve of the TOT in RAH crossed that of TLH on the 31st case of RAH. In contrast, both curves of the OT crossed on the 11th case of RAH.ConclusionThe TOT of the introduced RAH was equivalent to that of skilled TLH in approximately 30 cases since the first RAH. Furthermore, the OT of RAH was comparable to that of TLH in approximately 10 cases of surgery since the first RAH.