Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
2. CDC Foundation Atlanta Georgia
3. Office of Evaluation and Assessment University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan
4. Department of Learning Health Sciences University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
Abstract
IntroductionInterprofessional experiences provide critical exposure to collaborative health care teams, yet medical students often lack this experience during clinical clerkships. We created a labor and delivery triage rotation exclusively staffed by certified nurse‐midwives in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship to address this gap. We sought to evaluate the clinical learning experiences of medical students rotating on this midwife‐supervised collaborative team.MethodsBetween 2018 and 2020, we electronically sent all medical students an evaluation after each required clerkship. Our primary outcome was the quality of teaching score, as defined by level of agreement on a 5‐point Likert scale with a statement regarding teaching quality. A secondary outcome evaluated scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination taken by all students at the end of the rotation. Evaluations and assessments were compared between students rotating on labor and delivery triage and those who did not. Evaluation comments from students rotating on labor and delivery triage were collated to identify common themes.ResultsOf 374 students, 370 (98.9%) completed the end‐of‐clerkship course evaluation and 312 (83.4%) completed teaching evaluations. Sixty‐seven students (17.9%) rotated in labor and delivery triage; of these, 52 (77.6%) completed both the course and triage rotation evaluations. There were no differences in the mean quality of teaching scores (3.9 ± 1.2 versus 3.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.54) or in NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination scores between students rotating in labor and delivery triage compared to all other rotations (79.9% ± 7.2% vs 80.2% ± 7.8%, P = 0.436). Comments from teaching evaluations highlighted student exposure to the midwifery philosophy of care model.DiscussionThis work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of this midwife‐led authentic interprofessional collaborative experience for medical students. This model can serve as an example of how to implement and evaluate interprofessional collaboration experiences in the clinical setting.
Subject
Maternity and Midwifery,Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference10 articles.
1. World Health Organization;Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office.Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice.World Health Organization;2010. Accessed August 26 2022.https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?sequence=1
2. Interprofessional education. Association of American Medical Colleges website. Accessed October 29 2021.https://www.aamc.org/what‐we‐do/mission‐areas/medical‐education/interprofessional‐education
3. Interprofessional Education and Collaboration in Healthcare: An Exploratory Study of the Perspectives of Medical Students in the United States
4. What makes medical students receptive to interprofessional education? Findings from an exploratory case study
5. Association of American Medical Colleges.Curriculum Reports: Interprofessional Education Requirements at US Medical Schools. Accessed September 21 2023.https://www.aamc.org/data‐reports/curriculum‐reports/data/interprofessional‐education‐requirements‐us‐medical‐schools