Decontamination of biofilm‐contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro evaluation

Author:

Ichioka Yuki1ORCID,Virto Leire23ORCID,Nuevo Paula4,Gamonal Juan Daniel2,Derks Jan1ORCID,Larsson Lena1,Sanz Mariano2ORCID,Berglundh Tord1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontology Institute of Odontology The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

2. ETEP (Etiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri‐implant Diseases) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry Complutense University Madrid Spain

3. Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Optics Complutense University Madrid Spain

4. Research Laboratory, Faculty of Odontology Complutense University Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the cleaning efficacy of two mechanical and two chemical protocols in the decontamination of implant surfaces.MethodsIn total, 123 commercially available implants were mounted in plastic models mimicking peri‐implant circumferential intra‐bony defects. A multispecies biofilm was grown on implant surfaces. Mechanical (air‐polishing (AP), rotating titanium brush (TiB)) and chemical decontamination (alkaline electrolyzed water, N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine) protocols were used. Cleaning efficacy in terms of residual biofilm area, chemical surface properties, and bacterial counts were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction.ResultsSurface decontamination protocols including use of an AP device or a rotating TiB were superior in terms of biofilm removal and in reducing atomic% of Carbon on implant surfaces when compared to methods restricted to wiping with gauze. The use of chemical agents as adjuncts to the mechanical cleaning protocols provided no relevant overall benefit over saline. No treatment modality, however, resulted in complete biofilm removal.ConclusionAir‐polishing and rotating TiB were more effective implant surface decontamination protocols than wiping with gauzes. Use of chemical agents did not improve cleaning efficacy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3