Antibiotic therapy in dogs and cats in general practice in the United Kingdom before referral

Abstract

ObjectivesTo describe antibiotic prescription by veterinarians in general practices in the United Kingdom before referral and analyse if UK antibiotic stewardship guidelines were followed.Materials and MethodsThe clinical records from dogs and cats referred to the Internal Medicine and Oncology departments of two referral hospitals were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsThere were 917 cases included, of which 486 (53.0%) had been prescribed antibiotics for the presentation they were subsequently referred for. Bacterial culture or cytology to guide antibiotic prescription had been performed in 43 of 486 (8.8%) and nine of 486 cases (1.8%) respectively. In four cases, both cytology and culture were performed. For those animals who had received antibiotics, 344 of 486 (70.8%) prescriptions did not comply with UK antibiotic stewardship guidelines. Following investigations at a referral centre, a bacterial aetiology was found or suspected in 17.9% of the cases that received antibiotics.Clinical SignificanceUse of diagnostics, including culture and cytology, to prove or determine the likelihood of a bacterial aetiology was infrequently performed before referral and may have contributed to overprescription of antibiotics. Encouraging veterinarians to undertake appropriate diagnostics, in combination with education around compliance with antibiotic stewardship guidelines, might reduce antibiotic prescription.