Obstetric pain management for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: A qualitative and quantitative comparison of patient and provider perspectives (QUEST study)

Author:

Nowakowski Emma1,Dayananda Sanjana1,Morgan Madison1,Jarvis Olivia1,Altamirano Valeria1,LaSorda Kelsea R.1,Krans Elizabeth2ORCID,Lim Grace12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackground and aimPatients with opioid use disorder (OUD) may experience inadequate pain management especially during childbirth. This study assessed and compared patient and provider perspectives on analgesia during and after delivery in women with OUD.DesignProspective cohort, mixed method design including semi‐structured interviews and structured surveys with pregnant or recently pregnant patients (n = 17) and provider (n = 15) groups.SettingPrenatal clinics and hospital postpartum units.ParticipantsPatients were pregnant women with OUD currently treated with methadone (n = 1) or buprenorphine (n = 16). Providers were obstetricians (n = 5), obstetric nurses (n = 5) and anesthesiologists (n = 5).MeasurementsValidated questionnaires were completed by both groups; patient interviews were conducted during the third trimester and at 5 days post‐delivery. Patient topics included pain management preferences, analgesia satisfaction and attitudes toward pain. Provider topics included labor and postpartum pain management perspectives. Interviews were independently coded and qualitatively analyzed for major themes.FindingsFive major themes emerged from patient interviews: (1) neuraxial blockade was endorsed for labor pain; (2) otherwise, limited pain control options were perceived; (3) no consensus around use of opioids for pain; (4) non‐opioid options should be available; and (5) provider communication and health‐care system issues act as barriers to adequate pain management. Provider perspective themes included the following: (1) unique challenges in pain management for patients with OUD; (2) confusion on how to plan for and make perinatal adjustments to medication for OUD; (3) discrepant views on use of opioids for pain management; (4) endorsement of non‐pharmacological and non‐opioid options; and (5) need for improved provider collaboration in developing pain management plans.ConclusionsPatients with opioid use disorder and health‐care providers prioritize pain management during and after childbirth, but have discrepant views on use of opioids and other pain management options. Inadequate care coordination and discrepancies in opinions need to be addressed both within care teams and between patients and providers. Clinicians would benefit from better evidence to guide clinical care of patients with OUD for patient‐centered pain management.

Funder

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference28 articles.

1. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

2. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).National Survey of Drug Use and Health NSDUH Releases.2019. Accessed 5/5/2022.https://www.samhsa.gov/data/release/2019-national-survey-drug-use-and-health-nsduh-releases

3. Socioeconomic risk factors for fatal opioid overdoses in the United States: Findings from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study (MDAC)

4. Trends in pregnancy-associated mortality involving opioids in the United States, 2007–2016

5. Affective dimensions of postpartum pain are predictive of increased opioid requirements in women with opioid use disorder;Lim G;NIH J Women's Health,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3