Shifting paradigms: A collective and structural strategy for addressing healthcare inequity

Author:

Monteiro Sandra1ORCID,Acai Anita23ORCID,Kahlke Renate4ORCID,Chan Teresa M.56ORCID,Sukhera Javeed78ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Education and Innovation, Department of Medicine, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program McMaster University Ontario Hamilton Canada

2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program McMaster University Ontario Hamilton Canada

3. St. Joseph's Education Research Centre (SERC), St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Ontario Hamilton Canada

4. Division of Education and Innovation, Department of Medicine, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT) Program McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

5. Division of Emergency/Division of Education & Innovation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

6. Faculty of Health Sciences, Office of Continuing Professional Development McMaster University Ontario Hamilton Canada

7. Hartford Hospital/Institute of Living Hartford Connecticut USA

8. Department of Psychiatry Yale University School of Medicine Connecticut New Haven USA

Abstract

AbstractHealthcare inequity is a persistent systemic problem, yet many solutions have historically focused on “debiasing” individuals. Individualistic strategies fit within a competency‐based medical education and assessment paradigm, whereby professional values of social accountability, patient safety, and healthcare equity are linked to an individual clinician's competence. Unfortunately, efforts to realise the conceptual linkages between medical education curricula and goals to improve healthcare equity fail to address the institutional values, policies, and practices that enable structural racism. In this article, we explore alternative approaches that target collective and structural causes of health inequity. We first describe the structural basis of healthcare inequity by identifying the ways in which institutional culture, power and privilege erode patient‐centred care and contribute to epistemic injustice. We then outline some reasons that stereotypes, which are a culturally supported foundation for discrimination, bias and racism in healthcare, cannot be modified effectively through individualistic strategies or education curricula. Finally, we propose a model that centres shared values for leadership by individuals and institutions with consistency in goal setting, knowledge translation, and talent development. Figure 1 summarises the key recommendations. We have provided cases to supplement this work and facilitate discussion about the model's application to practice.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3