Factors relating to nonpublication and publication bias in clinical trials in Canada: A qualitative interview study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Factors relating to nonpublication and publication bias in clinical trials in Canada: A qualitative interview study

Published:2022-11-09 Issue:3 Volume:89 Page:1198-1206
ISSN:0306-5251
Container-title:British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
language:en
Short-container-title:Brit J Clinical Pharma

Author:

Morrow Richard L.¹^ORCID,Mintzes Barbara²,Gray Garry³,Law Michael R.⁴,Garrison Scott⁵,Dormuth Colin R.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

2. School of Pharmacy University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Sociology University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada

4. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada

5. Department of Family Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Funder

Ministry of Health, British Columbia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bcp.15574

Reference49 articles.

1. Favorable and publicly funded studies are more likely to be published: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

3. Extent of Non-Publication in Cohorts of Studies Approved by Research Ethics Committees or Included in Trial Registries

4. Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Statin Use and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Comprehensive Meta- Analysis and Systematic Review;Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery;2024-01-26

2. Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study;BMJ Open;2023-03