Commentary on: Monson <scp>KL</scp>, Smith <scp>ED</scp>, Peters <scp>EM</scp>. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners. <i>J Forensic Sci</i>. 2022;68(1):86–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556‐4029.15152.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Commentary on: Monson KL, Smith ED, Peters EM. Accuracy of comparison decisions by forensic firearms examiners. J Forensic Sci. 2022;68(1):86–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556‐4029.15152.

Published:2023-04-21 Issue:3 Volume:68 Page:1097-1101
ISSN:0022-1198
Container-title:Journal of Forensic Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Forensic Sciences

Author:

Gutierrez Richard E.¹²,Addyman Celeste¹

Affiliation:

1. Forensic Science Division Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender Chicago Illinois USA

2. Organization of Scientific Area Committees Legal Task Group, National Institute of Standards & Technology Gaithersburg Maryland USA

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15257

Reference33 articles.

1. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.Report to the President —Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature‐comparison methods.2016Available from:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_forensic_science_report_final.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2022

2. Fingerprints and miscarriages of justice: other types of error and a post‐conviction right to database searching;Cole SA;Alb Law Rev,2017

3. Inconclusives, errors, and error rates in forensic firearms analysis:Three statistical perspectives

4. Treatment of inconclusives in the AFTE range of conclusions

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluation of GLOCK 9 mm Firing Pin Aperture Shear Mark Individuality Based on 3,156 Different Pistols (Manufactured Over a 30 Year Period in Two Countries) Using Additional Pattern Matching and IBIS Pattern Recognition;Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine;2024-07-22

2. A call for open science in forensics;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2024-05-23

3. The false promise of firearms examination validation studies: Lay controls, simplistic comparisons, and the failure to soundly measure misidentification rates;Journal of Forensic Sciences;2024-04-29