Affiliation:
1. Statistics Department, Iowa State University, 2438 Osborne Dr, Ames, IA 50011; Centre for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence (CSAFE), Iowa State University, 613 Morrill Rd, Ames, IA 50011, USA
2. Statistics Department, University of Nebraska Lincoln, 340 Hardin Hall North Wing, Lincoln, NE 68583-0963, USA
Abstract
Abstract
In the past decade, and in response to the recommendations set forth by the National Research Council Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community (2009), scientists have conducted several black-box studies that attempt to estimate the error rates of firearm examiners. Most of these studies have resulted in vanishingly small error rates, and at least one of them (D. P. Baldwin, S. J. Bajic, M. Morris, and D. Zamzow. A Study of False-Positive and False-Negative Error Rates in Cartridge Case Comparisons. Technical report, Ames Lab IA, Performing, Fort Belvoir, VA, April 2014.) was cited by the President’s Council of Advisors in Science and Technology (PCAST) during the Obama administration, as an example of a well-designed experiment. What has received little attention, however, is the actual calculation of error rates and in particular, the effect of inconclusive findings on those error estimates. The treatment of inconclusives in the assessment of errors has far-reaching implications in the legal system. Here, we revisit several black-box studies in the area of firearms examination, investigating their treatment of inconclusive results. It is clear that there are stark differences in the rate of inconclusive results in regions with different norms for training and reporting conclusions. More surprisingly, the rate of inconclusive decisions for materials from different sources is notably higher than the rate of inconclusive decisions for same-source materials in some regions. To mitigate the effects of this difference we propose a unifying approach to the calculation of error rates that is directly applicable in forensic laboratories and in legal settings.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Law,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Philosophy
Reference46 articles.
1. Theory of identification, range striae comparison reports and modified glossary definitions;AFTE Journal,1992
2. Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition;Ashby;Psychological Review,1988
3. Francesca Simion, and Carlo Umilta. Symmetry and similarity effects in the comparison of visual patterns;Bagnara;Perception & Psychophysics,1983
4. A statistical study of the individual characteristics of fired bullets;Biasotti;Journal of Forensic Sciences,1959
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献