Cost-effectiveness of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris

Author:

Mavranezouli Ifigeneia12ORCID,Welton Nicky J.3,Daly Caitlin H.3,Wilcock Jane4,Bromham Nathan25,Berg Laura25,Xu Jingyuan26,Wood Damian7,Ravenscroft Jane C.8ORCID,Dworzynski Katharina25,Healy Eugene910

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UK

2. National Guideline Alliance Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists London UK

3. Department of Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol Bristol UK

4. Silverdale Medical Practice Pendlebury Health Centre Salford UK

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Manchester UK

6. Department of Dermatopharmacology University of Manchester Manchester UK

7. Department of Paediatrics Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham UK

8. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham UK

9. Dermatopharmacology, Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK

10. Department of Dermatology University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Acne vulgaris is a common skin condition that may cause psychosocial distress. There is evidence that topical treatment combinations, chemical peels and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) are effective for mild-to-moderate acne, while topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy are most effective for moderate-to-severe acne. Effective treatments have varying costs. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England considers cost-effectiveness when producing national clinical, public health and social care guidance. Aim To assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments for mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe acne to inform relevant NICE guidance. Methods A decision–analytical model compared costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of effective topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe acne, from the perspective of the National Health Service in England. Effectiveness data were derived from a network meta-analysis. Other model input parameters were based on published sources, supplemented by expert opinion. Results All of the assessed treatments were more cost-effective than treatment with placebo (general practitioner visits without active treatment). For mild-to-moderate acne, topical treatment combinations and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) were most cost-effective. For moderate-to-severe acne, topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, and oral isotretinoin were the most cost-effective. Results showed uncertainty, as reflected in the wide confidence intervals around mean treatment rankings. Conclusion A range of treatments are cost-effective for the management of acne. Well-conducted studies are needed to examine the long-term clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the full range of acne treatments.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Dermatology

Reference25 articles.

1. A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne;Tan;Br J Dermatol,2015

2. The interaction between acne vulgaris and the psyche;Baldwin;Cutis,2002

3. Psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris: evaluating the evidence;Tan;Skin Therapy Lett,2004

4. Reviewing the global burden of acne: how could we improve care to reduce the burden?;Layton;Br J Dermatol,2021

5. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of topical, oral, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris;Mavranezouli;Br J Dermatol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3