Estimation of health utility values for alopecia areata
-
Published:2024-03-29
Issue:6
Volume:33
Page:1581-1592
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Aggio Daniel,Dixon Caleb,Law Ernest H.,Randall Rowena,Price Thomas,Lloyd Andrew
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune-mediated inflammatory dermatological disease characterised by non-scarring hair loss affecting the scalp and sometimes other hair-bearing sites. This study aimed to elicit health state utility values (HSUVs) from the UK general population for AA using time trade off (TTO) interviews.
Methods
Vignette descriptions of health states defined by the extent of hair loss were developed (as well as one describing caregiver burden). These were developed using data from standardised patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, a literature review and qualitative interviews. Health states were defined based on the severity of alopecia tool (SALT), which assesses extensiveness of scalp hair loss. HSUVs were then elicited for each health state in TTO interviews with the UK public.
Results
One caregiver and five patient health states were developed based on the literature review findings, clinical trial PRO (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Alopecia Areata Patient Priority Outcomes Questionnaire) data and qualitative interviews with patients (N = 11), clinical experts (N = 4) and caregivers of adolescents with AA (N = 10). These data showed a more severe impact among patients with more extensive hair loss. One hundred and twenty participants evaluated the vignettes in TTO interviews. Patient HSUVs ranged from 0.502 for the most extensive hair loss health state (SALT 50–100 + eyebrow and eyelash loss) to 0.919 (SALT 0–10) for the mildest health state. The caregiver HSUV was 0.882.
Conclusion
Quantitative and qualitative data sources were used to develop and validate vignettes describing different AA health states. Patient and caregiver HSUVs demonstrate a large impact associated with AA, especially for states defined by more extensive hair loss.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Pratt, C. H., King, L. E., Messenger, A. G., Christiano, A. M., & Sundberg, J. P. (2017). Alopecia areata. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3, 1. 2. Cranwell, W. C., Lai, V. W., Photiou, L., Meah, N., Wall, D., Rathnayake, D., Joseph, S., Chitreddy, V., Gunatheesan, S., Sindhu, K., & Sharma, P. (2019). Treatment of alopecia areata: An Australian expert consensus statement. Australasian Journal of Dermatology, 60(2), 163–170. 3. Olsen, E. A., Hordinsky, M. K., Price, V. H., Roberts, J. L., Shapiro, J., Canfield, D., Duvic, M., King, L. E., McMichael, A. J., Randall, V. A., & Turner, M. L. (2004). Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines–Part II. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 51(3), 440–447. 4. Alopecia areata—Level 3 cause | Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Retrieved November 1, 2021 from http://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/alopecia-areata-level-3-cause 5. Harries, M., Macbeth, A. E., Holmes, S., Chiu, W. S., Gallardo, W. R., Nijher, M., de Lusignan, S., Tziotzios, C., & Messenger, A. G. (2022). The epidemiology of alopecia areata: A population-based cohort study in UK primary care. British Journal of Dermatology, 186(2), 257.
|
|