Worth it if you could afford it”: Patient perspectives on integrating real‐time benefit tools into drug cost conversations

Author:

Mattingly T. Joseph1ORCID,Everson Jordan2,Besaw Robert J.3,Whitmore Christine C.3,Henderson Sarah C.3,Dusetzina Stacie B.34

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research University of Maryland School of Pharmacy Baltimore Maryland USA

2. Department of Health and Human Services Data Analysis Branch, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Washington District of Columbia USA

3. Department of Health Policy Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA

4. Vanderbilt‐Ingram Cancer Center Nashville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMedication costs can lead to financial burdens for patients, creating barriers to effective medication use. Health care provider use of real‐time benefit tools (RTBTs) may facilitate cost conversations with patients. We sought to explicate patient views on how RTBTs could be used to improve cost considerations in prescribing decisions.MethodsWe conducted focus groups to characterize patient perspectives on holding cost conversations with their physicians and to identify factors that would influence the value of RTBTs. We focused on adults aged 50+ who reported trouble paying for their prescriptions. Three groups included patients with conditions requiring high‐cost treatments and one group included lower‐income patients independent of their medical conditions. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, coded, and categorized to salient themes employing inductive and deductive approaches using the Health Equity Implementation Framework.ResultsFocus groups were conducted from 09/2020–12/2020 including 18 participants representing cancer (n = 6), diabetes (n = 6), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3), and lower income (n = 3). Participants were between 50–74, eight self‐identified as Black, 10 as White, and eight reported earning <$50,000/year. We identified five themes regarding cost conversations (medication cost importance, past experiences with cost/cost conversations, perception of physician's role and knowledge, knowledge of existing resources, and influence on decision‐making) and four RTBT‐use‐specific themes (advantages/disadvantages, perceived relevance, data quality concerns, and implementation considerations).ConclusionApproaches that envision RTBTs as one‐size‐fits‐all technological interventions may underestimate the complexity of incorporating price information into prescribing decisions. Nevertheless, patients highlighted the potential value of accurate, real‐time information on medication costs to inform decision‐making.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3