Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence and Desire for Medication Cost Information Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older in the US in 2022

Author:

Dusetzina Stacie B.1,Besaw Robert J.1,Whitmore Christine C.1,Mattingly T. Joseph2,Sinaiko Anna D.3,Keating Nancy L.45,Everson Jordan16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

2. Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City

3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

6. Office of Technology, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC

Abstract

ImportanceRising prescription drug costs and increasing prices for consumer goods may increase cost-related medication nonadherence. Cost-conscious prescribing can be supported by real-time benefit tools, but patient views on real-time benefit tool use and their potential benefits and harms are largely unexplored.ObjectiveTo assess older adults’ cost-related medication nonadherence, cost-coping strategies, and views on the use of real-time benefit tools in clinical practice.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA weighted, nationally representative survey of adults aged 65 years and older administered via the internet and telephone from June 2022 to September 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCost-related medication nonadherence; cost coping strategies; desire for cost conversations; potential benefits and harms from real-time benefit tool use.ResultsAmong 2005 respondents, most were female (54.7%) and partnered (59.7%); 40.4% were 75 years or older. Cost-related medication nonadherence was reported by 20.2% of participants. Some respondents used extreme forms of cost-coping, including foregoing basic needs (8.5%) or going into debt (4.8%) to afford medications. Of respondents, 89.0% reported being comfortable or neutral about being screened before a physician's visit for wanting to have medication cost conversations and 89.5% indicated a desire for their physician to use a real-time benefit tool. Respondents expressed concern if prices were inaccurate, with 49.9% of those with cost-related nonadherence and 39.3% of those without reporting they would be extremely upset if their actual medication price was more than what their physician estimated with a real-time benefit tool. If the actual price was much more than the estimated real-time benefit tool price, nearly 80% of respondents with cost-related nonadherence reported that it would affect their decision to start or keep taking a medication. Furthermore, 54.2% of those with any cost-related nonadherence and 30% of those without reported they would be moderately or extremely upset if their physicians used a medication price tool but chose not to discuss prices with them.Conclusions and RelevanceIn 2022, approximately 1 in 5 older adults reported cost-related nonadherence. Real-time benefit tools may support medication cost conversations and cost-conscious prescribing, and patients are enthusiastic about their use. However, if disclosed prices are inaccurate, there is potential for harm through loss of confidence in the physician and nonadherence to prescribed medications.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3