Scale for the environments evaluation of professional nursing practice—shortened version: Psychometric evaluation

Author:

Ribeiro Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes1ORCID,de Lima Trindade Letícia2,da Rocha Carla Gomes3,Teles Paulo João Figueiredo Cabral4,Mendes Mariana5,Ribeiro Marlene Patrícia6,de Abreu Pereira Soraia Cristina7,da Conceição Alves Faria Ana7,da Silva João Miguel Almeida Ventura8,de Sousa Clemente Neves1

Affiliation:

1. Nursing School of Porto (ESEP) and CINTESIS@RISE Porto Portugal

2. Santa Catarina State University and Regional Community University of Chapecó Chapecó Brazil

3. Institute of Health, School of Health Sciences HES‐SO Sion Switzerland

4. School of Economics University of Porto and LIAAD‐INESC Porto LA Porto Portugal

5. CNPQ Scholarship Federal University of Santa Catarina Santa Catarina Brazil

6. Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa Penafiel Portugal

7. North Region Health Administration Lisbon Portugal

8. Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João Porto Portugal

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the shortened version of the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice (SEE‐Nursing Practice).MethodsThis methodological, cross‐sectional study was conducted between September and December 2022. The original version of the SEE‐Nursing Practice was administered in questionnaire format across 17 hospitals. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to identify relevant items for the new shortened version of the scale and evaluate its construct validity.ResultsThe study involved 1713 registered nurses from various regions of Portugal. From the exploratory factor analysis, the SEE‐Nursing Practice was condensed to 59 items and 3 subscales. In the structure subscale, 14 items were removed, and the remaining 29 items distributed over four factors; in the process subscale, 18 items were removed, and the remaining 19 items organized into three factors; in the outcome subscale, 2 items were removed, and the remaining 11 items distributed over two factors. The Cronbach's alpha for the three subscales exceeded 0.90, indicating high reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the validity of the 59‐item model.ConclusionThe shortened version of the SEE‐Nursing Practice shows adequate validity and reliability, reducing the burden associated with its longer version.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3