Is it time for job quality? Conceptualising temporal arrangements in new models of homecare

Author:

Burns Diane1ORCID,Hamblin Kate2ORCID,Fisher Duncan U.3ORCID,Goodlad Cate1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sheffield University Management School University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

2. Centre for International Research on Care, Labour and Equalities (CIRCLE) University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

3. Centre for Care University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Abstract

AbstractTime is a key organising principle in the formal provision of care to older people in their own homes. It is used when delivering homecare services, calculating fees and care staff’s pay entitlement. Research in the UK highlights how the predominant service model of compartmentalising care into pre‐defined tasks, delivered in strictly scheduled time‐based units, offers poor quality jobs, characterised by low pay, insecure and tightly controlled work. Our case study research of ‘new models’ of homecare however, found variation in the way time measures were operationalised. Drawing from Thompson’s (1967, Past & Present, 38, 56–97) conceptualisation of clock‐time (where care work is controlled by external measures of time) and nature’s time (where care work is performed through internal notions of time) as a lens, we examine how service delivery models and job quality are temporally connected through homecare work. Through our analysis, we exemplify how the use of strict time‐based measures can limit care work according to nature’s time. We also consider the potential of ambitemporality—the accommodation of clock and nature’s time—in organising service delivery as a means of enriching job quality. Finally, we discuss the pertinent implications of conceiving job quality in homecare work through a temporal lens.

Funder

ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health (social science)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3