Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA
Abstract
AbstractDisputes about the value of Diversity Training (DT) stem partly from disputes about what DT should entail and what its expected outcomes should be. We answer previous reviews’ calls for approaches to DT that are grounded in empirically supported theoretical frameworks. Specifically, and based on longstanding theory and research on attitude–behavior relations, we offer a dual‐process framework that identifies key factors for interventions to reduce individual‐level discrimination in organizational settings, including (a) automatic attitudes/bias, (b) awareness of the impact of bias, (c) motives relating to egalitarianism and conformity, and (d) the opportunity to engage in deliberative decision making. We offer suggestions, where available, for how DT might employ basic research known to impact these factors to construct more effective interventions. Finally, we offer guidance for targeted rather than “one‐size‐fits‐all” approaches to DT and advocate for an integration of DT tailored to individuals with structural interventions tailored to organizations.
Subject
Applied Psychology,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Social Psychology
Reference157 articles.
1. Aatewologun D. Cornish T.&Tresh F.(2018)Unconscious bias training: An assessment of the evidence for effectiveness (Report No. 113). Equality and Human Rights Commission. Available at:https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication‐download/unconscious‐bias‐training‐assessment‐evidence‐effectiveness Accessed 7 July 2021.
2. Theeffect of self‐affirmation on perception of racism;Adams G.;Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology,2006
3. Diversity Training Programme Outcomes: A Systematic Review
4. Burnout and stress are everywhere;American Psychological Association;APA Monitor,2022
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献