Clinical investigation and management of Brucella suis seropositive dogs: A longitudinal case series

Author:

Kneipp Catherine C.1ORCID,Deutscher Ania T.2ORCID,Coilparampil Ronald2,Rose Anne Marie3,Robson Jennifer4,Malik Richard56ORCID,Stevenson Mark A.1ORCID,Wiethoelter Anke K.1ORCID,Mor Siobhan M.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

2. Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department Primary Industries Menangle New South Wales Australia

3. School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland Gatton Queensland Australia

4. Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Centre for Veterinary Education University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Albert Pugsley Pl, Charles Sturt University New South Wales Australia

7. Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences The University of Liverpool Liverpool UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBrucellosis in dogs caused by Brucella suis is an emerging zoonotic disease.ObjectivesTo document clinical characteristics, serology, microbiology, and clinical response to treatment in B. suis‐seropositive dogs.AnimalsLongitudinal study of 27 privately‐owned dogs. Dogs that tested positive by serology, culture, or real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were included in the study.MethodsClinical (physical examination and imaging) and laboratory (serology, hematology, serum biochemistry, and qPCR or culture) assessments were made at baseline and after approximately 3, 6, 12, and 18 months.ResultsDogs were followed for 10 895 dog days, with 17/27 dogs completing the 18‐month follow‐up. Ten dogs had signs consistent with brucellosis before enrollment (n = 4), at baseline (n = 2) or during follow‐up (n = 6), with 2 dogs experiencing relapse of historical signs. Antibody titers persisted for the duration of follow‐up in 15/17 dogs (88%). Radiographic (n = 5) and ultrasound (n = 11) findings, of variable clinical relevance, were observed. Brucella DNA and organisms were detected in 3 dogs, all of which had clinical signs, including in the milk of a bitch around the time of whelping. Brucella DNA was not detected in blood (n = 92 samples), urine (n = 80), saliva (n = 95) or preputial swabs (n = 78) at any time during follow‐up. Six dogs underwent treatment, all of which achieved clinical remission although remission was not reflected by decreasing antibody titers.Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceMost dogs with B. suis infections have subclinical infections. Serology is poorly associated with clinical disease. Excretion of organisms appears rare except in whelping bitches. Clinical management using antibiotics with or without surgery is recommended.

Funder

Australian Companion Animal Health Foundation

University of Melbourne

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Veterinary

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3