Abstract
We tested whether informing women about stereotype threat is a useful intervention to improve their performance in a threatening testing situation. Men and women completed difficult math problems described either as a problem-solving task or as a math test. In a third (teaching-intervention) condition, the test was also described as a math test, but participants were additionally informed that stereotype threat could interfere with women's math performance. Results showed that women performed worse than men when the problems were described as a math test (and stereotype threat was not discussed), but did not differ from men in the problem-solving condition or in the condition in which they learned about stereotype threat. For women, attributing anxiety to gender stereotypes was associated with lower performance in the math-test condition but improved performance in the teaching-intervention condition. The results suggest that teaching about stereotype threat might offer a practical means of reducing its detrimental effects.
Cited by
393 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. High Impostors Are More Hesitant to Ask for Help;Behavioral Sciences;2024-09-12
2. The Argument from Prepared Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22
3. The Evolution of Fodor’s Case against Concept Learning;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22
4. Conclusion to Part III;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22
5. Embodied Cognition;The Building Blocks of Thought;2024-08-22