Unintended consequences of planting native and non‐native trees in treeless ecosystems to mitigate climate change

Author:

Moyano Jaime1ORCID,Dimarco Romina D.23ORCID,Paritsis Juan4ORCID,Peterson Tess2ORCID,Peltzer Duane A.5ORCID,Crawford Kerri M.2ORCID,McCary Matthew A.6ORCID,Davis Kimberley T.7ORCID,Pauchard Aníbal89ORCID,Nuñez Martin A.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Grupo de Ecología de Invasiones, INIBIOMA, CONICET Universidad Nacional del Comahue San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina

2. Department of Biology and Biochemistry University of Houston Houston Texas USA

3. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias Bariloche (INTA‐CONICET) San Carlos de Bariloche Río Negro Argentina

4. INIBIOMA, CONICET Universidad Nacional del Comahue San Carlos de Bariloche Argentina

5. DP. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research Lincoln New Zealand

6. Department of BioSciences Rice University Houston Texas USA

7. Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station USDA Forest Service Missoula Montana USA

8. Laboratorio de Invasiones Biológicas (LIB), Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Universidad de Concepción Concepción Chile

9. Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB) Santiago Chile

Abstract

Abstract Naturally treeless ecosystems are being replaced by native and non‐native trees worldwide, often through deliberate afforestation using forestry tree species. By introducing species having novel traits, such as relatively rapid growth, many afforestation efforts also produce numerous changes in ecosystems, at the landscape scale. Trees are considered critical for climate change mitigation; indeed, many current carbon sequestration strategies rely on trees. Planting trees or allowing trees to naturally colonize through range expansions can be seen as an ideal way to increase atmospheric carbon capture. For example, a snapshot approach may show that introducing trees into treeless ecosystems enhances aboveground accumulation of carbon, helping increase ecosystem carbon storage. However, considering other impacts such as reductions in soil carbon or albedo and increased fire severity (through increases in fuel loads and connectivity) reduces the effectiveness of afforestation strategies for climate change amelioration. Additional negative impacts of afforestation are also likely, such as the reduction of native biodiversity and productivity, substantial water yield losses, and changes in nutrient cycles, which can exacerbate other global change drivers. Further, tree invasions originating from afforestation can exacerbate these negative impacts. Synthesis. This review highlights that the positive and negative impacts of planting trees in naturally treeless ecosystems as a strategy to mitigate climate change are idiosyncratic, depending on the location where trees are introduced, the time period trees are allowed to grow, and risks of spread and impacts associated with specific tree species. Although planting trees can potentially be a tool to fight climate change, a greater consideration of their impacts is required to minimize the unexpected negative consequences of afforestation efforts.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3