Explaining variation in plant‐herbivore associational effects in a tree biodiversity experiment

Author:

Leonard Samuel J.123ORCID,Dirzo Rodolfo12,Eisenhauer Nico24,Rebollo Roberto25,Schädler Martin26,Ferlian Olga24

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Biology and Earth Systems Science Stanford University Stanford California USA

2. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany

3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA

4. Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

5. Departmennt of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland

6. Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz‐Centre for Environmental Research‐UFZ Halle Saale Germany

Abstract

Abstract Within biodiversity‐ecosystem function research, a major outstanding question is how herbivory, a critical ecosystem function at the base of the food web, changes along gradients of plant biodiversity. Neighbourhood‐level associational effects are hypothesised to be a strong driver of biodiversity‐herbivory relationships, but we lack a successful framework that explains the wide variation observed in the sign and magnitude of plant‐herbivore associational effects. In this study, we combine measurements from a tree biodiversity field experiment with simulation to provide a framework for explaining variation in plant‐herbivore associational effects, particularly when herbivores that feed on many different species (e.g. generalists) cause most damage. We show that monoculture herbivory levels of focal species and their neighbours predict the direction and strength of associational effects. We provide evidence that this may be due to a “spillover effect”, in which some insect herbivores attracted to focal individuals ultimately end up feeding on neighbouring individuals. With an empirically parameterised simulation, we explain how spatial organisation modifies biodiversity‐ecosystem function relationships when associational effects operate. We suggest a set of experiments to test the generality of our conceptual framework, to elucidate the underlying mechanisms that produce the patterns we find, and to ultimately increase the predictability of plant‐herbivore associational effects. We conclude by discussing how our results might inform pest management in diversified agroecosystems and reforestation sites. Synthesis. Our results provide a potential framework for explaining why positive and negative plant‐herbivore associational effects are often balanced in systems with primarily generalist herbivores and point to a path forward for predicting when increased plant biodiversity will be associated with increased, decreased or unchanged levels of insect herbivory on individual plant species in such systems.

Funder

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference88 articles.

1. Mixed cropping in India;Aiyer A.;Indian Journal of Agricultural Science,1949

2. Chernozem—Soil of the Year 2005

3. Vegetation diversity and insect pest outbreaks

4. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response;Andow D. A.;Annual Review of Entomology,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3