Optometrists' attitudes toward using OCT angiography lag behind other retinal imaging types

Abstract

AbstractPurposeWhile optometrists' attitudes toward established retinal imaging types are generally positive, they are unknown for optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). We performed a cross‐sectional survey to estimate attitudes toward OCTA and identify clinician and/or practice characteristics that influence them.MethodsA paper‐based survey was mailed to 252 randomly selected optometrists in Australia. Five‐point Likert‐scale items from a previous survey assessing attitudes toward new technology were included to probe respondent characteristics and attitudes toward retinal imaging. Performance expectancy attitudes toward OCTA were elicited by the statement ‘I believe OCTA is useful in daily practice’. Mean scores out of five (mean [SD]) were rounded and mapped to appropriate descriptive statements.ResultsThe response rate was 47% (118/252). The mean (SD) age of respondents was 44.0 (13.8) years and 50.8% (60/118) were female. Optometrists had 19.9 (14.0) years of clinical experience and 66.9% (79/118) worked at independent practices. In total, 8.5% (10/118) of respondents used OCTA to provide clinical care. Optometrists agreed that optical coherence tomography (OCT), colour fundus imaging, ultra‐wide field imaging and fundus autofluorescence (mean scores 3.6–4.7 out of 5) were useful in daily practice but felt neutral about whether OCTA was useful (3.4 [0.8]). Optometrists believed that OCTA was less enjoyable to use (p < 0.0001), less endorsed by peers (p < 0.0001) and felt less confident that they had the knowledge to interpret OCTA (p < 0.0001) compared to other retinal imaging types.ConclusionsOptometrists are undecided on whether OCTA is useful in daily practice and had lower expectations that using OCTA would confer job performance benefits compared to other retinal imaging types. Further work is needed to advocate the benefits of using OCTA across the profession.