The Emergence of Specialized Roles Within Groups

Author:

Goldstone Robert L.1,Andrade‐Lotero Edgar J.2,Hawkins Robert D.3,Roberts Michael E.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pschological and Brain Sciences Indiana University

2. School of Engineering, Science and Technology Universidad del Rosario

3. Princeton Neuroscience Institute Princeton University

4. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience DePauw University

Abstract

AbstractHumans routinely form groups to achieve goals that no individual can accomplish alone. Group coordination often brings to mind synchrony and alignment, where all individuals do the same thing (e.g., driving on the right side of the road, marching in lockstep, or playing musical instruments on a regular beat). Yet, effective coordination also typically involves differentiation, where specialized roles emerge for different members (e.g., prep stations in a kitchen or positions on an athletic team). Role specialization poses a challenge for computational models of group coordination, which have largely focused on achieving synchrony. Here, we present the CARMI framework, which characterizes role specialization processes in terms of five core features that we hope will help guide future model development: Communication, Adaptation to feedback, Repulsion, Multi‐level planning, and Intention modeling. Although there are many paths to role formation, we suggest that roles emerge when each agent in a group dynamically allocates their behavior toward a shared goal to complement what they expect others to do. In other words, coordination concerns beliefs (who will do what) rather than simple actions. We describe three related experimental paradigms—“Group Binary Search,” “Battles of the Exes,” and “Find the Unicorn”—that we have used to study differentiation processes in the lab, each emphasizing different aspects of the CARMI framework.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference89 articles.

1. Allen K. Jara‐Ettinger J. Gerstenberg T. Kleiman‐Weiner M. &Tenenbaum J. B.(2015).Go fishing! Responsibility judgments when cooperation breaks down. InProceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp. 84–89). Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.

2. Self-organized division of cognitive labor

3. The division of linguistic labour for offloading conceptual understanding

4. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.

5. Mini managers: Children strategically divide cognitive labor among collaborators, but with a self‐serving bias

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3