Arbitration and Relations Between the Parties

Author:

Dabscheck Braham1

Affiliation:

1. School of Industrial Relations and Organisational Behaviour, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia,

Abstract

Australia has developed a system, or systems of collective bargaining combining interactions between the parties, industrial tribunals, and political and legal processes. Arbitration has been one mechanism through which the parties have conducted their relationships. The nexus between arbitration and the parties is nuanced and fluid. It is not a simple command—obey relationship as characterised by Howard (1977) and Scherer (1985). Unions are not dependent on arbitration and tribunals have not been captured by union principles. Employer associations, in contradiction to Plowman (1988), have been proactive in pursuing the interests of employers. Following Mark Perlman (1954a, b), the successes of arbitration have been due to arbitrators being flexible and adaptable in fulfilling the diverse and changing needs of the parties. The inability of the federal tribunal to respond to the parties’ desire to adopt enterprise bargaining in the early 1990s, has resulted in a reduction in its role and influence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Industrial relations,Business and International Management

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3