Tablet‐based tests of everyday visual function in a diabetic macular oedema (DME) clinic waiting area: A feasibility study

Author:

Taylor Deanna J.1ORCID,Alquiza Paolo J.2,Jones Pete R.1ORCID,Wilson Iain34ORCID,Bi Wei1,Sim Dawn A.2ORCID,Crabb David P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health Sciences City, University of London London UK

2. Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK

3. Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences University of Oxford Oxford UK

4. Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractPurpose(1) To assess the feasibility of conducting tablet‐based vision tests in hospital clinic waiting areas; (2) To test the hypothesis that increasing severity of diabetic macular oedema (DME) is associated with the performance of tablet‐based surrogates of everyday tasks and self‐reported visual function.MethodsSixty‐one people with mild (n = 28), moderate (n = 24) or severe (n = 9) DME performed two tablet‐based tests of ‘real‐world’ visual function (visual search and face recognition) while waiting for appointments in a hospital outpatient clinic. Participants also completed a tablet‐based version of a seven‐item, visual‐functioning (VF‐7) patient‐reported outcome measure. Test performance was compared to previously published 99% normative limits for normally sighted individuals.ResultsThirty‐four participants (56%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 43%–68%) exceeded normative limits for visual search, while eight (13%; 95% CI 65%–24%) exceeded normative limits for face discrimination. Search duration was significantly longer for people with severe DME than those with mild and moderate DME (p = 0.01). Face discrimination performance was not significantly associated with DME severity. VF‐7 scores were statistically similar across DME severity groups. Median time to complete all elements (eligibility screening, both tablet‐based tasks and the VF‐7) was 22 (quartiles 19, 25) min. Further, 98% and 87% of participants, respectively, reported the search task and face discrimination task to be enjoyable, while 25% and 97%, respectively, reported finding the two tasks to be difficult.ConclusionsPortable tablet‐based tests are quick, acceptable to patients and feasible to be performed in a clinic waiting area with minimal supervision. They have the potential to be piloted in patients' homes for self‐monitoring.

Funder

Allergan

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3