Overconfident results with the bivariate random effects model for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Overconfident results with the bivariate random effects model for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

Published:2022-03 Issue:1 Volume:15 Page:6-9
ISSN:1756-5383
Container-title:Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:J Evidence Based Medicine

Author:

Furuya‐Kanamori Luis¹,Meletis Eletherios²,Xu Chang³,Kostoulas Polychronis²,Doi Suhail AR³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UQ Centre for Clinical Research Faculty of Medicine The University of Queensland Herston Australia

2. Laboratory of Epidemiology and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Public and One Health, School of Health Sciences University of Thessaly Karditsa Greece

3. Department of Population Medicine College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University Doha Qatar

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jebm.12467

Reference20 articles.

1. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations

2. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis

3. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews

4. Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data

5. Performance measures of the bivariate random effects model for meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Methods of diagnostic meta-analysis: comparing the generalized linear mixed model and the split component synthesis model;Current Opinion in Epidemiology and Public Health;2024-06-28

2. Diagnostic Accuracy of V/Q and Q SPECT/CT in Patients with Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis;Thrombosis and Haemostasis;2022-11-24