Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data

Published:2013-11 Issue:11 Volume:66 Page:1281-1288
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Ochodo Eleanor A.,Reitsma Johannes B.,Bossuyt Patrick M.,Leeflang Mariska M.G.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference27 articles.

1. Methods guide for medical test reviews. AHRQ Publication No. 12-EC017,2012

2. Comprehensive overview of methods and reporting of meta-analyses of test accuracy. Methods research report. (Prepared by the Tufts Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10055-I.) AHRQ;Dahabreh,2012

3. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests;Irwig;Ann Intern Med,1994

4. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy;Leeflang;Ann Intern Med,2008

5. Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers;Reitsma;Clin Chem,2012

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison and validation of metadta for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies;Research Synthesis Methods;2023-04-18

2. Overconfident results with the bivariate random effects model for meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies;Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine;2022-03

3. Evidence-Informed Public Health, Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis;Modern Biostatistical Methods for Evidence-Based Global Health Research;2022

4. A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2021-04

5. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in endocrinology: an audit of methods, reporting, and performance;Endocrine;2017-06-05