Affiliation:
1. Ufa Eye Research Institute Ufa Russia
2. Ufa Eye Institute Ufa Russia
3. Privatpraxis Prof Jonas Und Dr Panda‐Jonas Heidelberg Germany
4. Department of Ophthalmology Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany
5. Institut Français de Myopie Hôpital Fondation Rothschild Paris France
6. Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore National Eye Center Singapore City Singapore
7. New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY USA
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo assess associations between atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) and ocular parameters and diseases.MethodsThe population‐based Ural Eye and Medical Study (UEMS) and the Ural Very Old Study (UVOS) included 4894 individuals (age: 40+ years) and 835 individuals (age: 85+ years), respectively.ResultsIn the UEMS, AF prevalence (80/4894; 1.6%; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.0) increased from 1/1029 (0.1%) in the age group of 40 to <50 years to 29/619 (4.7%) and 12/159 (7.5%) in the age groups of 70 to <80 years and 80+ years, respectively. Higher AF prevalence correlated with older age (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.12; p < 0.001), urban region of habitation (OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.12; p < 0.001), higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease/stroke (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.32, 4.72; p < 0.001) and lower prevalence of neck pain (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14, 0.85; p = 0.02), higher serum concentration of bilirubin (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; p < 0.001) and lower prothrombin index (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.99; p = 0.003), higher stage of arterial hypertension (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.28; p = 0.04) and higher ankle‐brachial index (OR: 22.1; 95% CI: 4.45, 1.10; p < 0.001). In that model, AF prevalence was not associated with ocular parameters such as intraocular pressure (p = 0.52), retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (p = 0.70), refractive error (p = 0.13), axial length (p = 0.14), nuclear cataract degree (p = 0.50) and prevalence (p = 0.40), cortical cataract degree (p = 0.43) and presence (p = 0.17), lens pseudoexfoliation (p = 0.58), status after cataract surgery (p = 0.38), age‐related macular degeneration prevalence (p = 0.63), open‐angle glaucoma presence (p = 0.90) and stage (p = 0.55), angle‐closure glaucoma prevalence (p = 0.99) and stage (p = 0.99), diabetic retinopathy prevalence presence (p = 0.37) and stage (p = 0.32), and myopic macular degeneration (p = 0.98). In the UVOS, similar results were obtained.ConclusionsIn these multi‐ethnic populations from Russia, AF prevalence was not associated with any major ocular disease and may not play a major role in the pathogenesis of these disorders.