Natural history of clonal haematopoiesis seen in real‐world haematology settings

Author:

Patel Shyam A.12ORCID,Gerber William K.1,Zheng Rena1,Khanna Shrinkhala1,Hutchinson Lloyd3,Abel Gregory A.4,Cerny Jan12ORCID,DaSilva Brandon A.5,Zhang Tian Y.56,Ramanathan Muthalagu12,Khedr Salwa3,Selove William3,Woda Bruce3,Miron Patricia M.3,Higgins Anne W.3,Gerber Jonathan M.12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine UMass Memorial Medical Center, UMass Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

2. Center for Clinical and Translational Science UMass Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Pathology UMass Memorial Medical Center, UMass Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

6. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Stanford University Stanford California USA

Abstract

SummaryRecursive partitioning of healthy consortia led to the development of the Clonal Hematopoiesis Risk Score (CHRS) for clonal haematopoiesis (CH); however, in the practical setting, most cases of CH are diagnosed after patients present with cytopenias or related symptoms. To address this real‐world population, we characterize the clinical trajectories of 94 patients with CH and distinguish CH harbouring canonical DNMT3A/TET2/ASXL1 mutations alone (‘sole DTA’) versus all other groups (‘non‐sole DTA’). TET2, rather than DNMT3A, was the most prevalent mutation in the real‐world setting. Sole DTA patients did not progress to myeloid neoplasm (MN) in the absence of acquisition of other mutations. Contrastingly, 14 (20.1%) of 67 non‐sole DTA patients progressed to MN. CHRS assessment showed a higher frequency of high‐risk CH in non‐sole DTA (vs. sole DTA) patients and in progressors (vs. non‐progressors). RUNX1 mutation conferred the strongest risk for progression to MN (odds ratio [OR] 10.27, 95% CI 2.00–52.69, p = 0.0053). The mean variant allele frequency across all genes was higher in progressors than in non‐progressors (36.9% ± 4.62% vs. 24.1% ± 1.67%, p = 0.0064). This analysis in the post‐CHRS era underscores the natural history of CH, providing insight into patterns of progression to MN.

Funder

Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Massachusetts

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3