Development and validation of a brain fog scale for coeliac disease

Author:

Knowles Simon R.1ORCID,Apputhurai Pragalathan2ORCID,Tye‐Din Jason A.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Australia

2. Department of Health Sciences and Biostatistics Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Australia

3. Immunology Division Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Melbourne Australia

4. Department of Gastroenterology the Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Australia

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundBrain fog is a subjective cognitive impairment commonly reported in coeliac disease. A standardised tool to define and assess it is an important unmet need.AimsTo develop a patient‐informed tool to assess brain fog in coeliac disease to support clinical care, research and drug development.MethodsA pilot online study defined patient descriptors of brain fog. A second study evaluated the factor structure and performance of the scale across two‐time points (‘Now’ and in the ‘Past week’). One month later, participants were invited to repeat the study with two online cognitive processing tests, the Stroop task and the trail making test.ResultsAmong adults with treated coeliac disease, 37 (91.9% F) participated in the pilot study and 510 (88.8% F) in the second study of whom 99 repeated the study 1 month later with 51 completing cognitive testing. The most common brain fog descriptors were ‘difficulty focusing’, ‘difficulty thinking’ and ‘difficulty finding the right words and communicating’. The 12‐item scale reflects ‘cognitive impairment’ and ‘somatic and affective experience’ and demonstrates strong psychometric properties. It tracked with patients report of brain fog being present or absent across two‐time points. It did not significantly correlate with the cognitive tests.ConclusionThe brain fog assessment and severity scale is the first patient‐informed clinical outcomes assessment tool measuring brain fog in coeliac disease. It is brief and validated for two time‐based formats. Further research coupling it with biomarker discovery is needed to confirm its validity as a predictor of cognitive performance.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3