20 years of interactive tasks in large‐scale assessments: Process data as a way towards sustainable change?

Author:

Stadler Matthias12ORCID,Brandl Laura1,Greiff Samuel3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Ludwig Maximilians University Munich Munich Germany

2. Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany

3. Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences University of Luxembourg Esch‐sur‐Alzette Luxembourg

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOver the last 20 years, educational large‐scale assessments have undergone dramatic changes moving away from simple paper‐pencil assessments to innovative, technology‐based assessments. This comprehensive switch has led to some rather technical improvements such as identifying early guessing or improving standardization.ObjectivesAt the same time, process data on student interaction with items has been shown to carry value for obtaining, reporting, and interpreting additional results on student skills in international comparisons. In fact, on the basis of innovative simulated assessment environments, news about student rankings, under‐ and overperforming countries, and novel ideas on how to improve educational systems are prominently featured in the media. At the same time, few of these efforts have been used in a sustainable way to create new knowledge (i.e., on a scientific level), to improve learning and instruction (i.e., on a practical level), and to provide actionable advice to political stakeholders (i.e., on a policy level).MethodsThis paper will adopt a meta‐perspective and discuss recent and current developments with a focus on these three perspectives. There will be a particular emphasis on new assessment environments that have been recently employed in large‐scale assessments.Results and ConclusionsMost findings remain very task specific. We propose a necessary steps that need to be taken in order to yield sustainable change from analysing process data on all three levels.ImplicationsNew technologies might be capable of contributing to the research‐policy‐practitioner gap when it comes to utilizing the results from large‐scale assessments to increase the quality of education around the globe but this will require a more systematic approach towards researching them.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Education

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3