LGBTQ+ new and expectant parents' experiences of perinatal services during theUK's first COVID‐19 lockdown

Author:

Greenfield Mari12,Darwin Zoe3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King's College London UK

2. The Open University Milton Keynes UK

3. School of Human and Health Sciences University of Huddersfield Huddersfield UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCOVID‐19 created specific challenges for new and expectant parents and perinatal services. Services changed rapidly in the United Kingdom (UK), including the withdrawal of home birth services, birth center closures, and restrictions on the number of birth partners allowed in the birth room. The purpose of this study was to examine how these changes affected the experiences of LGBTQ+ parents in the UK.MethodsAn online survey was conducted in April 2020 to provide real‐time data capture of new and expectant families' experiences. It was open to those in the third trimester, or to those who had given birth since the beginning of the first UK lockdown period, and their partners. The survey asked open‐ended questions about perinatal experiences. Demographic data were also collected, including sexual orientation and gender. Responses were collected from 1754 participants, including 76 who self‐identified as LGBTQ+.ResultsThematic analysis identified that LGBTQ+ new and expectant parents faced similar issues to cisgendered, heterosexual expectant parents, though additional concerns were also noted relating to support and recognition. Heterocentric policies negatively affect lesbian families. Non‐birthing co‐mothers feared invalidation as parents. Sexual minority pregnant women were more likely than heterosexual pregnant women to consider additional birth supporters and to consider freebirthing.DiscussionService changes introduced in the pandemic were cisheteronormative, creating additional challenges for LGBTQ+ new and expectant parents and compounding existing inequalities. When planning, changing, or evaluating perinatal services, specific consideration is needed to include birthing parents who are not mothers and mothers who did not give birth. If appropriate care is not available, consequences may include impaired perinatal wellbeing and restricted birth choices. Including sexual orientation and gender in data collection enables different perspectives to be considered.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3