Clinicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of functional neurological disorders correlate with referral decisions

Author:

Begley Roisin1,Farrell Lynn2,Lyttle Nigel3,Alty Jane456,Curran David1,Williams Stefan6,Graham Christopher D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Queen's University Belfast Belfast UK

2. Psychology Department National College of Ireland Dublin Ireland

3. Adult Acute Neuropsychology Services, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Belfast UK

4. Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

5. Royal Hobart Hospital Hobart Tasmania Australia

6. Neurology Department Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesUncertainty regarding the legitimacy of functional neurological disorder (FND) remains among some health care professionals. Despite treatment guidelines and consensus recommendations, variability in clinical practice referral decisions persists. Evidence from other conditions suggests such clinical decision making is impacted by practitioners' implicit and explicit attitudes. We aimed to identify whether health care professionals hold implicit and/or explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of FND and whether these attitudes are associated with referral decision making.Design/MethodsWe included 66 health care professionals who work with people with neurological conditions: n = 37 medical doctors, mainly neurologists (n = 18) and psychiatrists (n = 10), and n = 29 doctoral level practitioner psychologists. Participants completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT), Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), a referral decision‐making vignette task and self‐report measures of explicit attitudes on FND‐legitimacy, therapeutic optimism and clinician confidence. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) was used as a comparator condition.ResultsParticipants self‐reported strong explicit FND‐legitimate and MS‐legitimate attitudes but demonstrated an implicit FND‐illegitimate/MS‐legitimate bias. Deeper examination provided by the IRAP data indicated pro‐FND‐legitimate attitudes, but no bias for or against FND‐illegitimate—contrasting the pro‐MS‐legitimate, anti‐MS‐illegitimate attitudes for the comparator condition. Attitudes about FND‐illegitimacy were negatively associated with likelihood of referral to physical interventions such as physiotherapy. Medical doctors had lower treatment optimism and stronger explicit attitudes that FND is illegitimate than psychologists.ConclusionsAt an implicit level, clinicians are uncertain about the illegitimacy of FND, and such attitudes are associated with lower likelihood of referral to physiotherapy in particular. Improved education on FND among health care professionals is indicated.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Applied Psychology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3