Affiliation:
1. School of Social Sciences Monash University Clayton Australia
2. School of Languages, Literatures, Cultures and Linguistics Monash University Clayton Australia
Abstract
AbstractNormative political theorists working in the field of linguistic justice generally believe that participation in democratic life in linguistically diverse societies requires a shared lingua franca (e.g., Patten 2009; Van Parijs 2011). Even when a shared lingua franca is present, however, there is likely to be a variety of ways in which people speak it, due to variations in accent, pitch, register, and lexicon. This paper examines the implications of intra‐linguistic diversity for democracy and political representation. More specifically, by drawing on Andrew Rehfeld's (2010) work and on relevant sociolinguistics research, the paper argues that widespread unconscious linguistic prejudice constitutes a constraint on some citizens' right to run for political office that is incompatible with democratic equality. The argument is illustrated via a number of examples concerning Australian politicians.
Reference91 articles.
1. ABS [Australian Bureau of Statistics].2021. “Language Used at Home (LANP) ” 15 October.https://www.abs.gov.au/census/guide‐census‐data/census‐dictionary/2021/variables‐topic/cultural‐diversity/language‐used‐home‐lanp
2. ABS [Australian Bureau of Statistics].2022. “Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Communities ” 28 June.https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/people‐and‐communities/snapshot‐australia/2021#culturally‐and‐linguistically‐diverse‐communities
3. The Southern Accent as a Heuristic in American Campaigns and Elections
4. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy