Prediction of the antigenic regions in eight RhD variants identified by computational biology

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesChanges in RHD generate variations in protein structure that lead to antigenic variants. The classical model divides them into quantitative (weak and Del) and qualitative (partial D). There are two types of protein antigens: linear and conformational. Computational biology analyses the theoretical assembly of tertiary protein structures and allows us to identify the ‘topological’ differences between isoforms. Our aim was to determine the theoretical antigenic differences between weak RhD variants compared with normal RhD based on structural analysis using bioinformatic techniques.Materials and MethodsWe analysed the variations in secondary structures and hydrophobicity of RHD*01, RHD*01W.1, W2, W3, RHD*09.03.01, RHD*09.04, RHD*11, RHD*15 and RHD*21. We then modelled the tertiary structure and calculated their probable antigenic regions, intra‐protein interactions, displacement and membrane width and compared them with Rhce.ResultsThe 10 proteins are similar in their secondary structure and hydrophobicity, with the main differences observed in the exofacial coils. We identified six potential antigenic regions: one that is unique to RhD (R3), one that is common to all D (R6), three that are highly variable among RhD isoforms (R1, R2 and R4), one that they share with Rhce (R5) and two that are unique to Rhce (Ra and Rbc).ConclusionThe alloimmunization capacity of these subjects could be explained by the variability of the antigen pattern, which is not necessarily recognized or recognized with lower intensity by the commercially available antibodies, and not because they have a lower protein concentration in the membrane.