Affiliation:
1. Department of Veterinary Medicine University of Sassari Sassari Italy
2. Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Protection University of Life Sciences Lublin Poland
3. Department of Veterinary Medicine University of Bari Valenzano (Bari) Italy
4. Institute of Animal Breeding and Biodiversity Conservation University of Life Sciences Lublin Poland
5. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pharmacology Kasetsart University Bangkok Thailand
6. Department of Veterinary Sciences University of Pisa Pisa Italy
Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of robenacoxib (RX), a COX‐2 selective non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug, in goats after single intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC) and oral (PO) administrations. 5‐month‐old healthy female goats (n = 8) were used. The animals were subjected to a three‐phase, two‐dose (2 mg/kg IV, 4 mg/kg SC, PO) unblinded, parallel study design, with a four‐month washout period between the IV and SC treatment, and a one‐week period between the SC and PO treatment. Blood was drawn from the jugular vein in heparinized vacutainer tubes at 0, 0.085 (for IV only), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 h. Plasma RX concentrations were measured using HPLC coupled to a UV multiple wavelength detector, and the data were pharmacokinetically analysed using ThothPro™ 4.3 software in a non‐compartmental approach. Following IV administration, terminal elimination half‐life, volume of distribution and total clearance were 0.32 h, 0.24 L/kg and 0.52 L/h/kg, respectively. For SC and PO, the mean peak plasma concentrations were 2.34 and 3.34 μg/mL at 1.50 and 0.50 h, respectively. The t1/2λz was significantly different between the IV and the extravascular (EV) administrations (0.32 h IV vs 1.37 h SC and 1.63 h PO), suggesting the occurrence of a flip‐flop phenomenon. The significant difference in Vd values between IV (0.24 L/kg) and EV (0.95 L/kg SC and 1.71 L/kg; corrected for F %) routes might have also triggered the t1/2λz difference. The absolute average SC and PO bioavailability were high (98% and 91%, respectively). In conclusion, the IV administration of RX might not be suitable for goats, due to its short t1/2λz. The EV routes, however, appear to be convenient for the drug's occasional use.
Subject
General Veterinary,Pharmacology
Reference48 articles.
1. Anonymous. (2012).Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation.http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2011/08/WC500109686.pdf
2. Evaluation of the dose-response relationship of oral robenacoxib in urate crystal-induced acute stifle synovitis in dogs
3. Protein binding of fluoroquinolones applied to live‐stock and companion animals;Bregante M. A.;Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics,2000