Work‐based feedback conversations with GP teachers

Author:

Sturman Nancy Jennifer1ORCID,MItchell Benjamin1,Jennings Warren1,Kelly Michaela1ORCID,O'Reilly Joanne Margaret1,King David1

Affiliation:

1. General Practice Clinical Unit The University of Queensland Medical School Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionFeedback may play out in the general practice workplace less usefully than anticipated by educators. We investigated work‐based feedback conversations about directly observed student tasks embedded in the supervisor's clinical consultations with patients.MethodsFeedback conversations between GP teachers and medical students and subsequent student reflections were audio‐recorded. Student and GP teacher focus groups were also conducted and transcribed professionally. An iterative, qualitative descriptive analysis integrating all transcripts was undertaken. Findings are discussed under the descriptive categories of feedback structure, content and perceived value.ResultsTwenty feedback conversations (total duration of 85 min) between five GP teachers, nine students and 20 student reflections (total duration of 58 min) were analysed. GP teachers actively engaged students in reflection and used balancing scripts and soft correction strategies. Students appeared to have some difficulty steering feedback conversations, which focused more on general skills than case‐specific content knowledge. The recorded conversations were fragments of ongoing, in‐practice teaching and learning, explicit and implicit. Student reflections suggested that they were able to grasp learning points effectively and identify room for growth. Praise and positive self‐feedback appeared to reassure students, particularly when they were disappointed by their performances.DiscussionFormal ‘set‐piece’ feedback conversations may be a useful opportunity to explicitly surface and/or reinforce previous ‘in‐practice’ reflection and feedback using a systematic structure. They may also reassure and encourage students and foster positive educational alliances. Students value in‐practice and on‐practice feedback but may prefer more control of the latter conversations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Review and Exam Preparation,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3