Sociocultural factors influencing ‘assessments for learning’ at the clinical workplace – A scoping review

Author:

Riaz Qamar1,Waterval D. G. J.2,Sehlbach Carolin2,Paulus A. T. G (Aggie)3

Affiliation:

1. Aga Khan University

2. Maastricht University

3. Chair CAPHRI Research line ‘Creating Value-based Healthcare’ (VHC), Maastricht University

Abstract

Abstract

Background Workplace-based assessments (WPBAs) play a crucial role in competency-based medical education (CBME) by facilitating learning and informing progression. While many studies have emphasized the role of socio-cultural factors on their implementation as assessment for learning (AfL), a gap exists in understanding how these factors influence WPBAs across different cultural contexts. This review aims to bridge this gap by elucidating how various socio-cultural factors can either enable or hinder the utilization of WPBAs for AfL. Methods Arksey and O’Malley’s 5-stage framework was used for this scoping review. Nine databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, Google scholar and PakMedinet were searched for studies published between 1995 and 2023. Hofstede’s 4 cultural dimensions namely power distance index, Masculinity vs Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance Index, and Individualism vs Collectivism were used as the lens to describe the identified socio-cultural factors. Results Of 2939 articles screened for eligibility using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 81 were included for full text review. The factors influencing use of WPBA for AfL were classified broadly into Cultural and Contextual factors. While most contextual factors behaved similarly in western and non-western contexts, differences were found in the way cultural factors affected perceptions and use of WPBAs in different cultural contexts. Conclusions This review provided insights into varying effects of socio-cultural factors on WPBAs as AfL across diverse cultural contexts. These insights can be valuable for institutional leaders, program directors, and faculty members engaged in the implementation of effective WPBA within their specific contexts. prompting further investigation.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3