When and Why Are Campaigns’ Persuasive Effects Small? Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

When and Why Are Campaigns’ Persuasive Effects Small? Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Published:2022-08-10 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0092-5853
Container-title:American Journal of Political Science
language:en
Short-container-title:American J Political Sci

Author:

Broockman David E.¹,Kalla Joshua L.²

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Berkeley

2. Yale University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ajps.12724

Reference44 articles.

1. Democracy for Realists

2. Information and Elections

3. Arias Eric HoracioLarreguy JohnMarshall andPabloQuerubin.2018. “Priors Rule: When Do Malfeasance Revelations Help or Hurt Incumbent Parties?” NBER Working Paper No. 24888.https://www.nber.org/papers/w24888

4. The electoral consequences of voter ignorance

5. Banerjee Abhijit V. SelvanKumar RohiniPande andFelixSu.2011. “Do Informed Voters Make Better Choices? Experimental Evidence from Urban India.” Working paper.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Barking up the wrong tree? Voter bias and female underrepresentation in Japanese politics;Social Science Japan Journal;2024-08-26

2. Chinese state media persuades a global audience that the “China model” is superior: Evidence from a 19‐country experiment;American Journal of Political Science;2024-07-20

3. How Do Consumers React to Ads That Meddle in Out-Party Primaries?;Journal of Consumer Research;2024-07-04

4. Encouraging loyalty and defection: The impact of campaigns on tactical voting in Britain;American Journal of Political Science;2024-06-17

5. Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook;Science;2024-05-31