Barking up the wrong tree? Voter bias and female underrepresentation in Japanese politics

Author:

Lim Sijeong1ORCID,Tanaka Seiki23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of International Studies, Korea University , Seoul , Republic of Korea

2. Department of International Relations and International Organization (IRIO), University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands

3. Faculty of Law, Kobe University , Kobe , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies on gender bias in the evaluation of politicians by voters have reported mixed results. We seek to understand these mixed findings by focusing on Japan, where female political representation is the lowest among advanced democracies and gender stereotypes are prevalent. We consider that gender stereotypes and the dearth of women in politics affect the evaluation of politicians via two distinct mechanisms: biased beliefs and weak priors. The two mechanisms are assumed to run counter to each other, thus leading to the null or mixed findings for gendered evaluation reported by previous studies. To test our argument, we conduct a series of survey experiments in Japan. Our findings conform to neither of the two mechanisms. Even in a society with low female political representation, we find no evidence of the gendered evaluation of candidates by voters. We suggest that rather than biasing voters’ evaluation of candidates, gender stereotypes dissuade women from aspiring to a political career and elite electoral gatekeepers from selecting female candidates.

Funder

National Research Foundation of Korea

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference67 articles.

1. ‘What Do We Learn About Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?’;Abramson;American Journal of Political Science,2022

2. Joseiseijika Ni Taisuru Yukensha No Taido: Dare Ga Joseiseijika Wo Shiji Surunoka’ [Voters’ Attitudes Toward Female Politicians: Who Support Female Politicians?];Aiuchi;Ningen Fukushi Kenkyu [The Human Welfare Review],2008

3. ‘Gender Stereotyping and the Electoral Success of Women Candidates: New Evidence from Local Elections in the United States’;Anzia;British Journal of Political Science,2022

4. A Note on Dropping Experimental Subjects Who Fail a Manipulation Check’;Aronow;Political Analysis,2019

5. ‘Evidence of Rising Rates of Inattentiveness on Lucid in 2020’;Aronow;SocArXiv,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3