Secure, Online, High-Stakes Testing: Science Fiction or Business Reality?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Secure, Online, High-Stakes Testing: Science Fiction or Business Reality?

Published:2009-03 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:31-34
ISSN:1754-9426
Container-title:Industrial and Organizational Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:Ind. organ. psychol.

Author:

Foster David

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference10 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2003). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Principle 9.01 Bases for Assessments, Section (b). Retrieved from www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html

2. Cheating on Tests

3. UNPROCTORED INTERNET TESTING IN EMPLOYMENT SETTINGS

4. American National Standards Institute. (2007). Retrieved from http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/ConformityAssessment/PersonnelCertifierAccreditation/DocumentsrelatedtoaccreditationunderANSI-ISO-IEC17024/PublicDocuments/ANSI-PCAC-GI-504.pdf

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Academic Fraud and Remote Evaluation of Accounting Students: An Application of the Fraud Triangle;Journal of Business Ethics;2024-03-04

2. Do outcomes from high stakes examinations taken in test centres and via live remote proctoring differ?;Computers and Education Open;2021-12

3. Internet‐Based Proctored Assessment: Security and Fairness Issues;Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice;2020-07-20

4. Cheaters on an aptitude test in an earlier selection hurdle are not more likely than non-cheaters to fake on a personality test in a subsequent selection hurdle;Personality and Individual Differences;2020-04

5. Conservation implications of limited Native American impacts in pre-contact New England;Nature Sustainability;2020-01-20