A stoichiometric approach to estimate sources of mineral‐associated soil organic matter

Author:

Chang Yi1ORCID,Sokol Noah W.2ORCID,van Groenigen Kees Jan3ORCID,Bradford Mark A.4ORCID,Ji Dechang1ORCID,Crowther Thomas W.5ORCID,Liang Chao6ORCID,Luo Yiqi7ORCID,Kuzyakov Yakov8910ORCID,Wang Jingkuan1ORCID,Ding Fan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Land and Environment Shenyang Agricultural University Shenyang China

2. Physical and Life Sciences Directorate Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore California USA

3. Department of Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK

4. Yale School of the Environment Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA

5. Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland

6. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenyang China

7. School of Integrative Plant Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

8. Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems Georg‐August University of Göettingen Göettingen Germany

9. Department of Agricultural Soil Science Georg‐August University of Göettingen Göettingen Germany

10. Agro‐Technological Institute Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) Moscow Russia

Abstract

AbstractMineral‐associated soil organic matter (MAOM) is the largest, slowest cycling pool of carbon (C) in the terrestrial biosphere. MAOM is primarily derived from plant and microbial sources, yet the relative contributions of these two sources to MAOM remain unresolved. Resolving this issue is essential for managing and modeling soil carbon responses to environmental change. Microbial biomarkers, particularly amino sugars, are the primary method used to estimate microbial versus plant contributions to MAOM, despite systematic biases associated with these estimates. There is a clear need for independent lines of evidence to help determine the relative importance of plant versus microbial contributions to MAOM. Here, we synthesized 288 datasets of C/N ratios for MAOM, particulate organic matter (POM), and microbial biomass across the soils of forests, grasslands, and croplands. Microbial biomass is the source of microbial residues that form MAOM, whereas the POM pool is the direct precursor of plant residues that form MAOM. We then used a stoichiometric approach—based on two‐pool, isotope‐mixing models—to estimate the proportional contribution of plant residue (POM) versus microbial sources to the MAOM pool. Depending on the assumptions underlying our approach, microbial inputs accounted for between 34% and 47% of the MAOM pool, whereas plant residues contributed 53%–66%. Our results therefore challenge the existing hypothesis that microbial contributions are the dominant constituents of MAOM. We conclude that biogeochemical theory and models should account for multiple pathways of MAOM formation, and that multiple independent lines of evidence are required to resolve where and when plant versus microbial contributions are dominant in MAOM formation.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Environmental Science,Ecology,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3