Abstract
I want to begin by making the fundamental point that the question is not whether decisions to end human lives ought to be made but, rather, who makes these decisions, and on the basis of what principles or values. For the fact is that such decisions are already being made, and inevitably must be made, in modern hospitals.For almost any life-threatening condition, modern medical technology can now delay the moment of death. Death will often not occur until and unless the decision has been made to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. In other words, when and how a patient dies is increasingly the outcome of a deliberate human decision. Such decisions—not to resuscitate a terminally ill patient, not to continue to sustain the life of a permanently comatose patient. or to withhold antibiotics from the deaf and blind octogenarian—are all instances of the intentional termination of life and, if done for the patient's sake, are cases of passive euthanasia.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference12 articles.
1. A Modern Myth: That Letting Die Is not the Intentional Causation of Death: Some Reflections on the Trial and Acquittal of Dr. Leonard Arthur;Kuhse;Journal of Applied Philosophy,1984
2. 7. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1983), at 77–89.
3. Are We a “Death-Denying” Society? A Sociological Review;Kellehear;Social Science and Medicine,1984
4. The Least Worst Death;Battin;Hastings Center Report,1983
5. 2. Report of a Working Party, Euthanasia and Clinical Practice (London: Linacre Centre, 1982), p. 57 (my italics).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献