Population dynamics of Listeria spp., Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli on fresh produce: A scoping review

Author:

Bolten Samantha1,Belias Alexandra1,Weigand Kelly A.23,Pajor Magdalena1,Qian Chenhao1,Ivanek Renata4,Wiedmann Martin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

2. Cary Veterinary Medical Library Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA

3. Flower‐Sprecher Veterinary Library Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

4. Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences Cornell University Ithaca New York USA

Abstract

AbstractCollation of the current scope of literature related to population dynamics (i.e., growth, die‐off, survival) of foodborne pathogens on fresh produce can aid in informing future research directions and help stakeholders identify relevant research literature. A scoping review was conducted to gather and synthesize literature that investigates population dynamics of pathogenic and non‐pathogenic Listeria spp., Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli on whole unprocessed fresh produce (defined as produce not having undergone chopping, cutting, homogenization, irradiation, or pasteurization). Literature sources were identified using an exhaustive search of research and industry reports published prior to September 23, 2021, followed by screening for relevance based on strict, a priori eligibility criteria. A total of 277 studies that met all eligibility criteria were subjected to an in‐depth qualitative review of various factors (e.g., produce commodities, study settings, inoculation methodologies) that affect population dynamics. Included studies represent investigations of population dynamics on produce before (i.e., pre‐harvest; n = 143) and after (i.e., post‐harvest; n = 144) harvest. Several knowledge gaps were identified, including the limited representation of (i) pre‐harvest studies that investigated population dynamics of Listeria spp. on produce (n = 13, 9% of pre‐harvest studies), (ii) pre‐harvest studies that were carried out on non‐sprouts produce types grown using hydroponic cultivation practices (n = 7, 5% of pre‐harvest studies), and (iii) post‐harvest studies that reported the relative humidity conditions under which experiments were carried out (n = 56, 39% of post‐harvest studies). These and other knowledge gaps summarized in this scoping review represent areas of research that can be investigated in future studies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Food Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3