Community‐level post‐hazard functionality methodology for buildings exposed to floods

Author:

Nofal Omar1,Rosenheim Nathanael2,Kameshwar Sabarethinam3,Patil Jayant4,Zhou Xiangnan4,van de Lindt John W.5,Duenas‐Osorio Leonardo4,Cha Eun Jeong6,Endrami Amin7,Sutley Elaina7,Cutler Harvey8,Lu Tao8,Wang Chen9,Jeon Hwayoung9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Florida International University Miami Florida USA

2. Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA

4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Rice University Houston Texas USA

5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA

6. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Champaign Illinois USA

7. Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA

8. Department of Economics Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA

9. National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Champaign Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractThis paper presents a building‐level post‐hazard functionality model for communities exposed to flood hazards including the interdependencies between the population, buildings, and infrastructure. An existing portfolio of building archetypes is used to model the post‐hazard physical flood functionality of different building typologies within the community with the goal of supporting resilience‐informed decision‐making. Specific fragility‐based flood functionality curves were developed for this portfolio to quantify the exceedance probability of a prescribed set of functionality states. While the physical functionality of buildings is significant to the total functionality of a building and community resilience assessment, the functionality of utilities such as power and water along with the accessibility of the household to essential services such as schools and hospitals is crucial to measure their total functionality. Therefore, functionality models for essential infrastructure were developed to assess housing unit‐ and building‐level functionality following flood hazards. This model also accounts for the functionality of the road network following a flood hazard to identify the level of accessibility of households to different services (e.g., schools, hospitals, gas stations, shopping centers, etc.). The main novelty of this paper is the ability to quantify the total functionality of buildings based on a socio‐physical formulation after including the interdependencies between the functionality of the physical systems and the subsequent functionality of the socio‐economic systems, which is key to measuring resilience at the community level. This was evident from the analysis results using a testbed community of Lumberton, NC, showing that the physical functionality is not sufficient to quantify the total post‐hazard functionality of buildings and that the functionality of other subsystems such as utilities and accessibility to essential services are also needed to quantify the total functionality of buildings and the livability of households.

Funder

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Colorado State University

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3