Characteristics and perceptions of utilising telehealth for predominantly middle‐aged to older, metropolitan‐based general medical patients

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEffective post‐pandemic telehealth (TH) requires understanding patients' characteristics and perceptions, which have not been established in broader clinical services and are independent of TH appointments.AimsTo understand medical patients' characteristics and perspectives on using TH.MethodsGeneral medical patients in a statewide tertiary hospital in Victoria, Australia received a de‐identified survey independent of TH appointments during visits between July and November 2020. Patients' characteristics, access to devices enabling TH, knowledge of TH and willingness to use TH were analysed with descriptive statistics.ResultsOf 1600 patients, 754 (46.4% female, aged 72.0 years [59.0–83.0]) were able to complete the survey. The majority lived in metropolitan areas (74.4%), owned at least one TH device (98.1%) and had internet access at home (55.6%). About 52.7% of patients were comfortable with their devices, and 43.5% had successfully used TH. Although patients preferred face‐to‐face appointments (80.8%) and 41.4% agreed TH would be as good as in‐person appointments, 63.9% were interested in future TH appointments. Patients preferring face‐to‐face appointments were older (P = 0.008) and had lower education levels (P = 0.010), whereas patients preferring TH had video TH devices (P < 0.05), were comfortable with their devices (P = 0.002) and were willing to use TH (P < 0.05). TH cost saving was parking AU$10.0 [0.0–15.0], driving AU$5.8 [4.5–19.9], public transport AU$8.00 [5.0–10.0], taxis AU$30.00 [15.0–50.0] and time AU$153.2 [76.6–153.2].ConclusionFrom predominantly middle‐aged to older, metropolitan‐based general medical patients completing the survey, most patienpreferred face‐to‐face appointments to TH. Health services should subsidise those in need of TH and target the patients' barriers to effective TH use.