The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The validity of ipsative and quasi-ipsative forced-choice personality inventories for different occupational groups: A comprehensive meta-analysis

Published:2014-12-17 Issue:4 Volume:88 Page:797-834
ISSN:0963-1798
Container-title:Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Occup Organ Psychol

Author:

Salgado Jesús F.¹,Anderson Neil²,Tauriz Gabriel¹

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Labour Relations; University of Santiago de Compostela; Spain

2. Brunel University London; UK

Funder

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad

Leverhulme Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/joop.12098/fullpdf

Reference140 articles.

1. Situational constraints on the achievement-performance relationship: A service sector study;Adkins;Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001

2. Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis intro reaction generalization versus situational specificity;Anderson;International Journal of Selection and Assessment,2010

3. The practical validity of the Gordon Personal Profile among United States and foreign medical residents;Antler;Journal of Social Psychology,1967

4. Balch , D. E. 1977 Personality trait differences between successful and non-successful police recruits at a typical police academy and veteran police officers

Cited by 115 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hacking the perfect score on high-stakes personality assessments with generative AI;Personality and Individual Differences;2024-12

2. User Interface Design in Mobile Learning Applications: Developing and Evaluating a Questionnaire for Measuring Learners' Extraneous Cognitive Load;Heliyon;2024-09

3. The Rank-2PL IRT Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation with an EM Algorithm;Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics;2024-06-18

4. A Framework for Detecting Both Main Effect and Interactive DIF in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Assessments;Organizational Research Methods;2024-04-13

5. Mixed-Keying or Desirability-Matching in the Construction of Forced-Choice Measures? An Empirical Investigation and Practical Recommendations;Organizational Research Methods;2024-02-14