Proton‐to‐photon comparative treatment planning guidelines for the Australian context

Author:

Penfold Scott N.123ORCID,Dell'Oro Mikaela456,Gorayski Peter157,Hwang Eunji89ORCID,Le Hien157,Penfold Melanie16,Sykes Jonathan389ORCID,Vu Hanh68,Yeo Adam31011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Department of Physics University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

3. Particle Therapy Working Group Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, School of Medicine The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia

5. Cancer Research Institute University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia

6. Particle Therapy Working Group Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy Melbourne Victoria Australia

7. Department of Radiation Oncology Royal Adelaide Hospital Adelaide South Australia Australia

8. Department of Radiation Oncology Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Western Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

9. School of Physics, Institute of Medical Physics University of Sydney NSW Sydney New South Wales Australia

10. Department of Physical Sciences Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia

11. School of Applied Sciences RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractProton‐to‐photon comparative treatment planning is a current requirement of Australian Government funding for patients to receive proton beam therapy (PBT) overseas, and a future requirement for Medicare funding of PBT in Australia. Because of the fundamental differences in treatment plan creation and evaluation between PBT and conventional radiation therapy with x‐rays (XRT), there is the potential for a lack of consistency in the process of comparing PBT and XRT treatment plans. This may have an impact on patient eligibility assessment for PBT. The objective of these guidelines is to provide a practical reference document for centres performing proton‐to‐photon comparative planning and thereby facilitate national uniformity.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Reference32 articles.

1. Medical Treatment Overseas Program [Internet]. [Cited 27 Oct 2021.]Available from URL:https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/strategicpolicyMTO.htm

2. Medical Services Advisory Committee.Public Summary Document: Application No. 1638 – Proton beam therapy for paediatric and rare cancers 2021.

3. Particle therapy tumour outcomes: An updated systematic review

4. Particle therapy toxicity outcomes: A systematic review

5. First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3