Modelling the probability of meeting IUCN Red List criteria to support reassessments

Author:

Henry Etienne G.12ORCID,Santini Luca3ORCID,Butchart Stuart H. M.45ORCID,González‐Suárez Manuela6ORCID,Lucas Pablo M.37ORCID,Benítez‐López Ana8ORCID,Mancini Giordano3ORCID,Jung Martin9ORCID,Cardoso Pedro1011ORCID,Zizka Alexander12ORCID,Meyer Carsten11314ORCID,Akçakaya H. Reşit1516ORCID,Berryman Alex J.4ORCID,Cazalis Victor117ORCID,Di Marco Moreno3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany

2. École Normale Supérieure Paris France

3. Department of Biology and Biotechnologies “Charles Darwin” Sapienza Università di Roma Rome Italy

4. BirdLife International Cambridge UK

5. Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

6. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Reading UK

7. Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología Universidad de Sevilla Sevilla Spain

8. Department of Biogeography and Global Change Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN‐CSIC) Madrid Spain

9. Biodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Group, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Management Programme International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg Austria

10. Faculty of Sciences CE3C ‐ Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Sciences CHANGE ‐ Institute for Global Change and Sustainability University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal

11. Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe) Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

12. Department of Biology Philipps‐University Marburg Marburg Germany

13. Institute of Geosciences and Geography Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg Halle (Saale) Germany

14. Institute of Biology Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

15. Department of Ecology and Evolution Stony Brook University New York USA

16. IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) Gland Switzerland

17. Leipzig University Leipzig Germany

Abstract

AbstractComparative extinction risk analysis—which predicts species extinction risk from correlation with traits or geographical characteristics—has gained research attention as a promising tool to support extinction risk assessment in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. However, its uptake has been very limited so far, possibly because existing models only predict a species' Red List category, without indicating which Red List criteria may be triggered. This prevents such approaches to be integrated into Red List assessments. We overcome this implementation gap by developing models that predict the probability of species meeting individual Red List criteria. Using data on the world's birds, we evaluated the predictive performance of our criterion‐specific models and compared it with the typical criterion‐blind modelling approach. We compiled data on biological traits (e.g. range size, clutch size) and external drivers (e.g. change in canopy cover) often associated with extinction risk. For each specific criterion, we modelled the relationship between extinction risk predictors and species' Red List category under that criterion using ordinal regression models. We found criterion‐specific models were better at identifying threatened species compared to a criterion‐blind model (higher sensitivity), but less good at identifying not threatened species (lower specificity). As expected, different covariates were important for predicting extinction risk under different criteria. Change in annual temperature was important for criteria related to population trends, while high forest dependency was important for criteria related to restricted area of occupancy or small population size. Our criteria‐specific method can support Red List assessors by producing outputs that identify species likely to meet specific criteria, and which are the most important predictors. These species can then be prioritised for re‐evaluation. We expect this new approach to increase the uptake of extinction risk models in Red List assessments, bridging a long‐standing research‐implementation gap.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Reference65 articles.

1. Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing

2. Baston D. &ISciences LLC. (2022).exactextractr version 0.8.2.

3. A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species

4. BirdLife International. (2022).IUCN Red List for birds.http://www.birdlife.org

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3