Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification

Published:2017-03-24 Issue:5 Volume:96 Page:607-616
ISSN:0001-6349
Container-title:Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
language:en
Short-container-title:Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

Author:

Pyykönen Aura¹²^ORCID,Gissler Mika³⁴^ORCID,Løkkegaard Ellen⁵⁶,Bergholt Thomas⁵⁷,Rasmussen Steen C.⁵⁷,Smárason Alexander⁸⁹,Bjarnadóttir Ragnheiður I.⁸⁹¹⁰^ORCID,Másdóttir Birna B.¹⁰,Källén Karin¹¹¹²^ORCID,Klungsoyr Kari¹³¹⁴,Albrechtsen Susanne¹⁴¹⁵,Skjeldestad Finn E.¹⁶,Tapper Anna-Maija¹¹⁷^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Helsinki; Helsinki Finland

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Helsinki University Hospital; Helsinki Finland

3. National Institute for Health and Welfare THL; Helsinki Finland

4. Department of Neurobiology; Care Sciences and Society; Division of Family Medicine; Karolinska Institute; Stockholm Sweden

5. University of Copenhagen; Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Nordsjaelland Hospital; Hillerod Denmark

7. Department of Obstetrics; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen Denmark

8. The Icelandic Birth Registry; Akureyri Iceland

9. Institute of Health Science Research; University of Akureyri; Akureyri Iceland

10. Landspitali University Hospital; Reykajvik Iceland

11. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare; Stockholm Sweden

12. University of Lund; Lund Sweden

13. Department of Health Registries; Norwegian Institute of Public Health; Bergen Norway

14. Department of Clinical Science; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway

15. Haukeland University Hospital; Bergen Norway

16. Department of Community Medicine; Faculty of Health Sciences; UiT the Arctic University of Norway; Tromsø Norway

17. Hyvinkää Hospital; Hyvinkää Finland

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,General Medicine

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/aogs.13108/fullpdf

Reference25 articles.

1. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study;Macfarlane;BJOG,2016

2. The Increasing Trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014;Betrán;PLoS ONE,2016

3. World Health Statistics 2015: World Health Organization 2015 http://www.who.int/(accessed

4. Appropriate technology for birth;Lancet,1985

Cited by 72 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Looking back to look forward: Has the time arrived for active management of obstetricians in placenta accreta spectrum?;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2024-07-24

2. From evidence to tailored decision-making: a qualitative research of barriers and facilitating factors for the implementation of non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section in Romania;BMJ Open;2024-02

3. Risk of stillbirth after a previous caesarean delivery: A Swedish nationwide cohort study;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2024-01-29

4. Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-12-31

5. In-Depth Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate in the Largest Secondary Care-Level Maternity Hospital in Latvia;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-10-09