Abstract
ObjectiveTo improve understanding of the drivers of the increased caesarean section (CS) rate in Romania and to identify interventions to reverse this trend, as well as barriers and facilitators.DesignA formative research study was conducted in Romania between November 2019 and February 2020 by means of in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions. Romanian decision-makers and high-level obstetricians preselected seven non-clinical interventions for consideration. Thematic content analysis was carried out.Participants88 women and 26 healthcare providers and administrators.SettingsCounties with higher and lower CS rates were selected for this research—namely Argeș, Bistrița-Năsăud, Brașov, Ialomița, Iași, Ilfov, Dolj and the capital city of București (Bucharest).ResultsWomen wanted information, education and support. Obstetricians feared malpractice lawsuits; this was identified as a key reason for performing CSs. Most obstetrics and gynaecology physicians would oppose policies of mandatory second opinions, financial measures to equalise payments for vaginal and CS births and goal setting for CS rates. In-service training was identified as a need by obstetricians, midwives and nurses. In addition, relevant structural constraints were identified: perceived lower quality of care for vaginal birth, a lack of obstetricians with expertise in managing complicated vaginal births, a lack of anaesthesiologists and midwives, and family doctors not providing antenatal care. Finally, women expressed the need to ensure their rights to dignified and respectful healthcare through pregnancy and childbirth.ConclusionConsideration of the views, values and preferences of all stakeholders in a multifaceted action tailored to Romanian determinants is critical to address relevant determinants to reduce unnecessary CSs. Further studies should assess the effect of multifaceted interventions.
Reference34 articles.
1. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014;Betrán;PLoS One,2016
2. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes;Souza;The 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health BMC Med,2010
3. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis;Keag;PLoS Med,2018
4. World Health Organization . WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. Available: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/
5. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study;Macfarlane;BJOG,2016